So your 401(k) has shrunk into a 301(k) - again - and your kid’s college fund wouldn’t cover a year in kindergarten anymore.
You’re thinking of cashing in what’s left of your investment, turning it into Krugerrands (gold is at record highs!) and burying it in the back yard.
So, how does a person avoid hair-pulling, teeth-gnashing, garment-rending gloom as a panicky stock market once again sends savings up in smoke?
Financial planners are fairly unanimous in their answer: Get an investment plan with an asset allocation - a fixed percentage pledged to stocks, to bonds, to cash.
Then marry the plan. Promise it your undying faithfulness, swearing to stick with it for better or worse.
When things get worse - as they have over the past three weeks - screw up your courage and do what the plan says. Right now, falling prices might have pulled your stock investments below their allocation. The plan would have you buy stocks, and sell bonds, in the midst of turmoil.
The genius of an investment plan is that it forces you to sell high and buy low - the key to investment success. Faith in your plan brings serenity. Or, that’s the idea anyway.
“The plan is simple, but it’s not easy,” says Larry Swedroe, research director at Buckingham Asset Management in Clayton. Lots of investors have trouble buying during a meltdown, and selling when things are going swimmingly.
“You have to caution them away from making decisions based on fear or greed,” says Peter Schick, chairman of the Moneta Group in Clayton. Fear is the stronger emotion, and the urge is strong to sell during a market panic.
Swedroe tells of one client who decided to sell out in November 2008, when the market hit a short-term bottom during the financial meltdown. Swedroe urged him to hold firm, but the client wanted out.
By January, stocks had climbed, and the client bought back in, only to watch stocks fall again. He sold again at the market bottom in March 2009. He’d doubled his losses by selling low and buying high.
A good plan starts by assessing your goals - college for the kids, retirement for you, becoming debt free. We’ll skip that part for now and get to the nitty gritty: asset allocation.
Investment success doesn’t depend on keen stock picking. The biggest determinant is how you divide your money, mainly between stocks, bonds and cash check cash advance.
You invest in stocks hoping for a fat return over the long run, knowing the market will give you heart failure regularly. Bonds provide a smoother ride, but historically a lower return. Cash is for bills coming soon. Some people sprinkle the pot with real estate and commodity funds.
Given the record of the past decade, you might wonder why you’d put a penny in stocks at all.
The stock market Friday was still 4 percent below its level at the height of tech bubble in 2000.
Professional financial planners have longer memories. The S&P 500 index of major-company stocks has returned an average of 11.5 percent over the last 30 years, dividends included. Bonds can’t beat that.
But twice in the last dozen years stocks dropped half their value. Ask yourself if you could stand a 25 percent investment loss without selling everything. If the answer is no, don’t put more than half your money in stocks, Swedroe says.
Bonds might lose a little money in a bad year, but they don’t crash like stocks. Over the past 10 years, while stocks were in a snit, a broad mix of bonds averaged 5 to 6 percent a year.
So, your allocation to stocks depends on the acid level in your stomach. Stocks are spice. Bonds are Tums.
Once you set your asset allocation, stick with it religiously. When the stocks rise above your plan’s limit, sell stocks and buy bonds. When stocks fall below, do the reverse.
That’s why the plan works. If you’d bought stocks when the financial crisis was at its scariest in March 2009, you’d be 72 percent ahead.
With an asset allocation plan, the market makes your decisions for you. You just follow the script.
Here are some examples, provided by Schick, on how allocation affects return. He picked a tough starting date, January 2000, the height of the tech stock bubble.
If you invested $100,000 then, with a portfolio of 70 percent stocks and 30 percent bonds, and rebalanced once a year, you’d have $141,000 today.
Had an investor put $100,000 just in the S&P 500 stock index, it would be worth $98,600 today. A mix of half bonds and half stocks would be worth $159,900 today. A 70 percent bond, 30 percent stock mix would be worth $176,500 today.
Source